|
|
||
|
|
During my early teens my archaeological interest was greatly influenced by the late Tony Gregory. He used to spend a long time with me in my school holidays showing me how to fieldwalk and process the information I retrieved. Gayton Thorpe was very much a site that I have fond memories of as this was one of the sites he asked me to fieldwalk and learn from. In 1998 the results of this work were published in the journal of the Norfolk and Norwich Archaeological Society. Below is an extract of the results.
Prehistoric
Two pieces of prehistoric metalwork were found during the survey; a third piece, now in the King’s Lynn Museum was found on the site in 1961.
Roman
Area A
Area C
Area E
Area F
Saxon/Medieval One Early Saxon organically-tempered sherd was found north of the main villa. Previously, a sherd of Early Saxon pottery had been found on the site prior to 1946 (NCM 75.946). The rest of the Saxon pottery recovered from the site was Late Saxon, consisting mostly of Grimston Thetford ware. The majority of these sherds were found east of the pit, although no concentration was located. No evidence of medieval occupation was found during the survey, except for a few sherds of Grimston Green-Glazed ware. A scatter of medieval pottery was report in 1980 in the northern part of the site, however, this was not located during the survey. Very little prehistoric pottery was found during the survey, and no noticeable concentrations were located. However, it appears that there was some activity on the site during this period, evident from a few flint-gritted sherds which were found and by the Late Iron Age Strap unions. South of the south block an area of building material was located (Area C). The large amount of flue tile, tesserae and opus signinum found, would suggest the present of a detached bath house (Gregory 1982, 362), possibly with a mosaic and tesseallated floors. Clearly this building was constructed to the same luxurious standards as the main villa. An aerial photograph of the site taken in 1974 shows that this building was possibly rectangular, although only part of it is clearly shown. This is enclosed by a boundary ditch. Although only part of the ditch is visible on the photograph, it may have enclosed all the immediate villa buildings Another building also evident on the 1974 photograph also appears rectangular and it located east of the villa. A large concentration of building material was recorded in this area also (Area D). The large amounts of red painted plaster indicate that part, if not all, of this building clearly had painted walls. Its function is unclear from surface evidence. A small concentration of building material east of the north block, and in direct alignment with the entrance of its verandas, suggest another building (Area B); its function is also unclear. Another much smaller concentration of tegulae, imbrices and odd fragment of tesserae was located south-east of the pit (Area E). Finds from this area are probably to sparse to indicate another building. A possible entrance road running north-west to south-east is also evident on the 1974 aerial photograph, approximately 75m west of the main villa, and ‘behind’ it is it faced east as suggested by Atkinson. This roads appears to be flanked by ditches on both sides and possibly connects the site to the Icknield Way. A long liner feature was also noted on the photograph (Gregory 1982, fig. 7) running from the area of the south block towards the pit; its function cannot be determined from current evidence. Although pottery is generally distributed over all parts of the site only one concentration was located north-east of the pit. This concentration (Area F) – judging from the evidence of samian, colour-coated ware and shell-gritted wares – dates from the 2nd – 4th centuries. Atkinson’s suggested date-range of AD 150-170 to 300-20 (Atkinson 1929. 208-209) fits well with the evidence from the pottery recovered during the survey, and the strong bias to the 3rd-4th centuries is common to most of the Icknield Way villas (Gregory 1982, 366). It appears that the floruit of the villa was certainly within the later Roman period.
Conclusion Gayton Thorpe was a well-developed villa, with two main buildings revealed by excavation (Atkinson 1929, 166-209). Fieldwork during 1982-5 located surface evidence for three other buildings, including a possible detached bath-house. The economy of the villa estate was probably based largely on agriculture, utilising the gault clays to the west, with their overlying glacial deposits, for cultivation; on the higher chalk lands to the east the rearing of livestock would probably have been of greater importance. The pottery finds from the recent work do not contradict Atkinson’s suggested mid 2nd to early 4th century date-range for the site, but Iron Age pottery and metalwork indicate earlier activity as well. There is no evidence of post-Roman occupation except for a few sherds of Late Saxon and medieval pottery. Atkinson, D., 1929 ‘The Roman Villa at Gayton Thorpe’. NorfolkArchaeology XXIII, 166-209.
|
|
Hill Farm - Unit F , Castle Acre Road, Great Dunham,
King's Lynn, Norfolk,
PE32 2LP England E-mail: sales@heritagemp.com
|